AnonTalk BBS

Topic: How to get child porn

Anonymous A started this topic 1.9 years (2008-04-10 16:57:?? UTC) ago (#1,019):

DO NOT ask for it on teh internetz.
DO NOT input it onto the Google/Yahoo!/MSN search box.
DO NOT do it yourself.

Get yourself a P2P like Ares or eMule and d'load it.

Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-10 17:04:?? UTC) ago, 7 minutes later (#3,170):

Well, from my experience with P2P networks, 99-100% of those "child porn" files are in fact fake. Actually, nothing is what it seems there. "hot slut getting fucked.avi" was usually a fat nigger having gay sex with a horsie stud, etc. Very unreliable and strange. Why do people keep those incorrectly named files around?

Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-10 17:25:?? UTC) ago, 20 minutes later, 27 minutes past creation (#3,175):

lol! never p2p, never trade, etc., etc. those are basic rules…

Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-10 20:50:?? UTC) ago, 3 hours later, 4 hours past creation (#3,199):

I'm amazed by how much I manage to find unintentionally. File upload sites are filled with CP.

Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-10 22:32:?? UTC) ago, 2 hours later, 6 hours past creation (#3,212):

just search pthc in limewire

Anonymous B replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-10 22:39:?? UTC) ago, 7 minutes later, 6 hours past creation (#3,213):

PedoBearShare?

Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 00:22:?? UTC) ago, 2 hours later, 7 hours past creation (#3,249):

Wow are you guys so slow?

TOR is made of CP.

Get TOR then go here -

http://eqt5g4fuenphqinx.onion/ [Tor-to-Web]

Then click TOR pedo.

Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 00:50:?? UTC) ago, 29 minutes later, 8 hours past creation (#3,265):

@previous

TOR is ungodly slow, individual sites are far too vulnerable from attack by anti-pedos because of the open nature, many of the TOR search engines I've seen block cp related terms because the admins are fuckheads, and the URLs of good sites change far too much. Try again.

Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 01:24:?? UTC) ago, 33 minutes later, 8 hours past creation (#3,286):

This is the FBI all your ips have been recorded await further instructions. Do not leave your home within the next 2hrs a squad car will be by shortly.

Anonymous B replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 01:26:?? UTC) ago, 2 minutes later, 8 hours past creation (#3,287):

@previous

Zzz…

Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 01:34:?? UTC) ago, 8 minutes later, 9 hours past creation (#3,292):

Hi there, have a seat please…

Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 13:29:?? UTC) ago, 12 hours later, 21 hours past creation (#3,352):

CP IS BAD!

Anonymous K joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 13:50:?? UTC) ago, 22 minutes later, 21 hours past creation (#3,365):

I thought that was what 4chan was for?

Anonymous B replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 13:57:?? UTC) ago, 6 minutes later, 21 hours past creation (#3,368):

@previous

4chan is censorship heaven. Not even dressed lolis are allowed there. So no.

Anonymous L joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-11 18:35:?? UTC) ago, 5 hours later, 1 day past creation (#3,427):

@3,286

I'm thinking posts like that should be reported and those users banned. Their only intention is to make people uncomfortable.

Anonymous M joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-12 02:08:?? UTC) ago, 8 hours later, 1 day past creation (#3,504):

@previous

Nobody cares about it anymore

Anonymous N joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-12 14:56:?? UTC) ago, 13 hours later, 2 days past creation (#3,555):

One word, freenet. Google it.

Anonymous O joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-12 16:37:?? UTC) ago, 2 hours later, 2 days past creation (#3,564):

Have you read the FAQ? the entire fucking point of this site is to allow for anonymous chat without stupid mods banning everyone

"Why was it created?
There simply wasn't anything out there like this. Remotely similar services, such as 4chan, suck more ass than I know how to put into written words and seemingly were designed by retarded monkeys. All the countless inane technical and usability issues aside, they randomly censor "controversial" posts and ban people "for fun". Here, you don't have to fear such idiocy but are able to freely speak your mind."

"Who the hell are you anyway?
Just a guy fed up with all the bullshit and the suffocating censorship going on around the Internet. I'm sick and tired of all these fucking high-on-power hypocrites (commonly known as "modfags"), preaching their pseudo-moralistic values and shoving their random rules down our throats."

Anonymous L replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-12 16:54:?? UTC) ago, 17 minutes later, 2 days past creation (#3,565):

@previous

Impersonating the FBI is a crime commited in an attempt to thwart discussions this forum is for. It's not a matter of "speaking ones mind". It's a retarded flame.

Anonymous G replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-12 17:34:?? UTC) ago, 40 minutes later, 2 days past creation (#3,567):

@previous

It's not a flame so much as a retarded joke that's been used over and over chanfags think is funny. And the whole point of AT is not using the same stupid shit replies over and over.

Anonymous P joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-13 21:12:?? UTC) ago, 1 day later, 3 days past creation (#3,684):

Just get limewire or something and type 'r@ygold'

Wait, why do I know that?

Anonymous L replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-14 11:28:?? UTC) ago, 14 hours later, 4 days past creation (#3,733):

@previous

Because you searched for Rick Astley and got something called "Rick Astley Paula Abdul George Foreman naked chicks r@ygold cp" and so on. Quite a lot of those.

Anonymous Q joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-14 21:21:?? UTC) ago, 10 hours later, 4 days past creation (#3,792):

stupid,why would you want to see cp… sick fuck

Anonymous R joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-14 22:17:?? UTC) ago, 56 minutes later, 4 days past creation (#3,802):

@3,249

tor seems to be only used for cp these days. i got rid of it because its not even useful for proxying as 4chan has banned all exit nodes. so fuck tor.

Anonymous R double-posted this 1.9 years (2008-04-14 22:18:?? UTC) ago, 37 seconds later, 4 days past creation (#3,803):

@3,368

You are a fool.

Anonymous S joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-15 02:01:?? UTC) ago, 4 hours later, 4 days past creation (#3,903):

what about baby porn?

Anonymous T joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-15 23:06:?? UTC) ago, 21 hours later, 5 days past creation (#4,012):

@previous

its AWWWWRIGHT

Anonymous U joined in and replied with this 1.9 years (2008-04-26 16:35:?? UTC) ago, 2 weeks later, 2 weeks past creation (#7,311):

@3,792

Forbidden fruit rule. People naturally want whatever authorities say they can't have.

Anonymous V joined in and replied with this 8 months (2009-07-23 23:40:?? UTC) ago, 1 year later, 1 year past creation (#186,778):

Well I use shareaza for it and I have about 250 good quality cp movies.
If you want to trade movies you can add me on torchat 4kv33bsxgsyq7wgj

© AnonTalk.com 2008–2010