Anonymous 1b11b5e411d5b0ab53f2a3cd97c2e10f started this discussion 3 months (2008-08-28 14:23:50 UTC) ago:
http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/6794/26477476iy8.gifIt's like we extracted any intelligence that actually existed on Retardchan and moved it over here.
Advertisement: Want your own message here? You can.
Anonymous 83f0f5b6546fc29b9c5e54329e0b6188 replied with this 3 months (2008-08-28 15:03:59 UTC) ago, 40 minutes later (#55,172):
we sure got told
Anonymous 4427f48d0a4e4a172eb47683ffe902bd replied with this 3 months (2008-08-28 20:21:18 UTC) ago, 5 hours later (#55,262):
meh. retardchan still wins.
i like my places uncensored, even if it means a lot of noise.
Anonymous 1b11b5e411d5b0ab53f2a3cd97c2e10f (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-08-28 20:45:23 UTC) ago, 24 minutes later (#55,274):
@55,262Wow… you really think that Retardchan is uncensored? Poor sheep…
Anonymous 4427f48d0a4e4a172eb47683ffe902bd replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 01:21:36 UTC) ago, 5 hours later (#55,373):
@55,274that is my experience, yes.
i've never been censored in 2 years of posting on retardchan, whereas here it happens almost daily.
Anonymous 1b11b5e411d5b0ab53f2a3cd97c2e10f (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 01:26:19 UTC) ago, 5 minutes later (#55,376):
@55,373It just means that you are a shit-posting troll.
Anonymous 4427f48d0a4e4a172eb47683ffe902bd replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 02:58:30 UTC) ago, 2 hours later (#55,388):
Anonymous 1b11b5e411d5b0ab53f2a3cd97c2e10f (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 03:02:07 UTC) ago, 4 minutes later (#55,391):
Anonymous 3949838434d73f8aa3e1e40c655a22ff replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 03:17:56 UTC) ago, 16 minutes later (#55,395):
It's not like real hardcore "controversial topic" censoring though. It only happens to big morons who can't use proper grammar and spelling, or trolls. I don't really count that as censoring, it just keeps the quality of the board up.
Anonymous 548971ec5603a0dc1b266f6466c01ed6 replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 04:25:49 UTC) ago, 1 hour later (#55,418):
Yeah, i like rchan better than AT, too.
I also like the U.S. better than communist China, so that makes kind of sense.
(BTW: I'd swear this thread was one post longer, last time i checked.)
Anonymous 3949838434d73f8aa3e1e40c655a22ff replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 04:35:06 UTC) ago, 9 minutes later (#55,420):
@55,418lol, with the way you're straining your faulty analogies, I can see why you'd like rchan better than AT.
Anonymous 548971ec5603a0dc1b266f6466c01ed6 replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 04:50:53 UTC) ago, 16 minutes later (#55,423):
@55,420Would you have liked NAZI Germany better as an AT representative?
That would have extended the analogy to also better represent the size difference. Not bad, actually.
Anonymous 3949838434d73f8aa3e1e40c655a22ff replied with this 3 months (2008-08-29 05:02:36 UTC) ago, 12 minutes later (#55,427):
@55,423heh, not to mention the enormous intelligence difference. Just stop trying to compare them, they are two different things. AT isn't exactly "censored" the way you probably think. Sysop is trying to keep the trolls and morons away so we can have a coherent discussion, like what we're doing now. Almost none of the topics on AT would ever thrive in rchan; there'd simply be too much meme spam and topic derailment. Just look at all the CP and pedophile topics, they aren't being blocked, are they?
(Replying to this topic is no longer possible because it has been locked.)
© AnonTalk.com 2008
