Anonymous 08a43e13588d5e881ab4a33b54f8216a started this discussion 3 months (2008-09-04 07:19:33 UTC) ago:
This is getting fucking stupid people. Why the fuck will you vote for Hillary Clinton or even John McCain only because he has a female running mate, just because they are female? Do people seriously want just a woman president? Why do we fucking need a woman president right now? Why the fuck don't wait for a good female candidate to come along and vote for her based on where she stands on issues and what she has done in the past. This is fucking pissing me off, STOP FUCKING PLAYING THE GOD DAMN GENDER CARD PEOPLE, I MEAN FUCK!
I still think Obama will be a better choice for presidency then McCain, and McCain might just win because he has a fucking female vice president. Are people really this god damn stupid?
Advertisement: Play some chess! See if you can outsmart the artificial intelligence…
Anonymous adb4a69a803bd1e2f80149e6f757b0c9 replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 07:30:07 UTC) ago, 11 minutes later (#57,263):
yes, america really is that stupid. A group tried to assassinate obama a week or so ago. Mccain will be voted in simply because america is full of petty rednecks/racists/fundies that seem to think it's less important that the candidate have strong sound political ideas and more important that YEEEAAAAHHH AMURRIKA!!
I hope that someone nukes the whole joint from orbit. To be sure.
Anonymous 08a43e13588d5e881ab4a33b54f8216a (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 07:35:55 UTC) ago, 6 minutes later (#57,268):
@57,263Dude, I'm live here hence the question I asked. Just nuke the south, I do not want to die because of fucking dumbass Americans fucked up the name for all of us. I feel so ashamed that I even decided to label myself after my home state then my home country. Californian bitch!
Anyways the south seems to be these god damn redneck pricks who are also religious. Meaning a woman as vice president having authority over a male for the position is in direct violation of the biblical verse 1 Timothy 2:12. I Seriously am beginning to hate the South. -.-
Anonymous 0fb65d99fbb5f3763e5fa9e31f07842e replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 07:42:52 UTC) ago, 7 minutes later (#57,270):
People don't support Clinton and Palin because they are female. People support them because they are ultra liberal and ultra conservative, respectively. Being female is only a plus for people that care about making history, just like Obama being non-white is only a plus to people who want to "stick it" to the Republicans.
Anonymous 0fb65d99fbb5f3763e5fa9e31f07842e replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 07:47:21 UTC) ago, 4 minutes later (#57,274):
@57,268> Anyways the south seems to be these god damn redneck pricks who are also religious. > I Seriously am beginning to hate the South. Try not to generalize people, and don't believe everything you see on the tele. Among other things, the Clintons are from the "South" considering Bill is the former Gov. of AK.
> -.-Please refrain from using emoticons, they can be misunderstood, especially at the end of a sentence.
Anonymous 08a43e13588d5e881ab4a33b54f8216a (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 07:51:07 UTC) ago, 4 minutes later (#57,277):
@57,274Well Bill Clinton was a good president because during his reign as president, the country was in a good shape before Baby Bush fucked shit up so badly that the country shall be hard to fix.
Anonymous 0fb65d99fbb5f3763e5fa9e31f07842e replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 07:58:54 UTC) ago, 8 minutes later (#57,281):
@57,277The best thing Clinton did for your country was not touch the economy. Almost nothing happened (in the grand scheme of things) while he was in office. Bush had a lot of stuff to deal with. Granted, he was a little too gung-ho and mishandled the situation, but don't praise Bill so highly.
Anonymous 08a43e13588d5e881ab4a33b54f8216a (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 08:04:59 UTC) ago, 6 minutes later (#57,285):
@57,281Well America did have more jobs than nowadays.
Plus I did some research on Bill for a school project, he didn't seem to be as bad as everyone claims him to be.
Anonymous 9b2efe5ba284cd01ca20b80b1f928074 replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 18:35:50 UTC) ago, 11 hours later (#57,450):
@57,270I too am a Californian, and I do the same thing.
Anonymous 0d526e7a174bc0b202fac31092b4dafb replied with this 3 months (2008-09-04 19:37:52 UTC) ago, 1 hour later (#57,465):
@57,285Your research is junk. The only reason Bill "seemed" like a good president was because Reagan and Bush Sr. had been working to get America going in the right direction. The economy cannot take 4 years to turn around, even with 8 years of Reagan and Bush Sr. trying to fix stuff, it was just starting to get better.
Anonymous 08a43e13588d5e881ab4a33b54f8216a (OP) replied with this 3 months (2008-09-05 10:24:20 UTC) ago, 15 hours later (#57,662):
@57,465Then why do we still have less jobs then hmmm? When Bill Clinton was president, we had a good variety of jobs. You are just butthurt over the fact that he "cheated" on his wife. Jesus Christ, let it go already.
Anonymous 0d526e7a174bc0b202fac31092b4dafb replied with this 3 months (2008-09-05 14:41:09 UTC) ago, 4 hours later (#57,691):
@57,662No, I really didn't pay much attention to that. It was his own problem, I don't think it really mattered as long as it didn't interfere with his job. Don't simply assume that people don't like Clinton simply because he cheated on his wife. Like I said earlier, you cannot seriously expect the President to effect economic changes in a four year span. It's simply too short of a time frame. Stuff like Bush Jr. doesn't help either though…
© AnonTalk.com 2008