Anonymous 6fcf6a4825d87f0a95bd46f3dd0a5bb5 started this discussion 2 months (2008-10-04 00:15:13 UTC) ago:
No matter what you submit, it never gets any "diggs". Not because your content sucks, but because nobody ever sees it. Don't waste your time with that piece of shit site where only the same ten people spam their own blogs directly to the front page. It's a complete waste of time to submit articles unless you are one of the "top diggers".
Advertisement: AT — the number one reason to own an Internet connection!
Anonymous 0fa2abf140aa45c70505cce41adc7c64 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 01:02:11 UTC) ago, 47 minutes later (#66,068):
I have managed to get two stories to the front page before. It all depends on who is online at the right time. But yes, there is a lot of people just asking for Diggs now, and it is sort of pointless.
Anonymous a7f85eaa647bc5d1efef5df83d7eff2c replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 16:51:58 UTC) ago, 16 hours later (#66,233):
We should all measure our self worth based on internet popularity contests. Really, though, what's so important about getting your article "diggs"?
Anonymous 6fcf6a4825d87f0a95bd46f3dd0a5bb5 (OP) replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 17:14:55 UTC) ago, 23 minutes later (#66,238):
Anonymous 22fb1753419bf7a93b9a86e14fa67cf2 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 17:24:23 UTC) ago, 9 minutes later (#66,242):
@66,238Oh, Digg pays it's users depending on how popular their submitted articles become? I didn't know. Would explain it, though. It's still a stupid system if you ask me.
Anonymous 6fcf6a4825d87f0a95bd46f3dd0a5bb5 (OP) replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 17:29:04 UTC) ago, 5 minutes later (#66,244):
@66,242Um… no. Turn on your brain.
Anonymous bce187c816928a2194b4577ed312cebe replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 17:52:01 UTC) ago, 23 minutes later (#66,247):
actually, it's probably because your content is crap.
good stuff on digg is often (but not always, true) found by some nerd who lives with his mother.
Anonymous 6fcf6a4825d87f0a95bd46f3dd0a5bb5 (OP) replied with this 2 months (2008-10-04 17:55:00 UTC) ago, 3 minutes later (#66,248):
@66,247You haven't even seen Digg.com, have you?
Anonymous 7dcb2d9591270f254a2486b1c52abaee replied with this 2 months (2008-10-07 21:26:42 UTC) ago, 3 days later (#67,371):
I've submitted tons of stories, even breaking news ones, but the max diggs I've gotten is 10 in one. Even trying to shout it out to your "friends" won't work. Site sucks. Even reddit sucks, posting breaking stories there too, never recieved a singe upvote.
© AnonTalk.com 2008