Anonymous 47fe4567ed67c0797b260bf76fc94af5 started this discussion 2 months (2008-10-09 02:09:35 UTC) ago:
Guess where? USA! USA! USA!
> Central Ohio authorities have filed felony charges against a 15-year-old girl accused of taking nude cell phone photos of herself and sending them to high school classmates.>> Police say the Newark Licking Valley student was arrested Friday and held over the weekend. On Monday, she entered denials to juvenile charges of illegal use of a minor in nudity-oriented material and possession of criminal tools.>> A spokeswoman for the Ohio attorney general's office says an adult convicted of the child pornography charge would have to register as a sexual offender, but a judge would have flexibility on the matter with a convicted juvenile.>> A prosecutor says Licking County authorities also considering charges for students who received the photos.http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,434645,00.html(Does anyone else find it hilarious that this happened in
Licking County?)
Advertisement: Do you know when and how to use the apostrophe in English? If not — learn!
Anonymous 9c6c7f95e5535d14fa8eb54916ae5a70 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 04:11:55 UTC) ago, 2 hours later (#67,815):
Yes, I do.
Anonymous 7a39d45cc00fea74f257fe41b1df11b5 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 12:25:04 UTC) ago, 8 hours later (#67,913):
Indeed.
Anonymous 0a0e496baf13a11ff223482cb92e49e4 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 19:20:20 UTC) ago, 7 hours later (#67,985):
usa rocks! fascist country on the brink of economical police charges 15 year old girls with selfCP.
Anonymous 636249b22dae07ff938ef3f1cc135e31 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 22:04:01 UTC) ago, 3 hours later (#68,028):
Things like this happen at my school occasionally, guys get a girls phone, send it to everyone and the whole school has some Sophomore's titties. No one gets involved even though teachers hear everyone talking about it.
Anonymous 355cf84b6d0594d7bdc244e5000604cb replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 22:07:29 UTC) ago, 3 minutes later (#68,031):
She's under 18, she knows she's not suppose to be sending other people naked pictures. What the fuck?
The thread title is misleading. I can understand if she kept it to herself, but distributing it?
Anonymous f3402208a84cd47c5f073c27b9290420 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 22:20:55 UTC) ago, 13 minutes later (#68,044):
@68,031Why not distribute it? I think the CP laws, especially the self CP laws, are bullshit. I mean, it's not like anyone was harmed. A slutty teenage girl got some attention and some horny 15 year old boys got to fap. It's not like actual CP, which features rape a good amount of the time, and yet for some reason, isn't prosecuted much.
I wonder, just maybe, could it be that America is trying to repress our kids' sexuality as just another part of the never-ending series of events to strip us of all our thoughts and character and brainwash us into what they want us to think, while pushing their anti-CP/pedo agenda as far as they can?
Anonymous ab0fff72ca7d80e1197974cf770ee68e replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 22:35:02 UTC) ago, 14 minutes later (#68,052):
It's total bull this law. It's like charging a baby for pissing in a public place. It doesn't know any better. Why should a 15 yo know any better. It's just absolute bull crap. The more they do this the more they try and repress people and natural tendencies, the more people become aggressive and lash out.
Anonymous 72346a843a7337e80f90c508faac3a96 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-09 22:56:47 UTC) ago, 22 minutes later (#68,064):
The thing that amazes me is she's considered to be both the perp and the victim at the same time. Under this definition, I "molested" myself daily at that age.
Anonymous 355cf84b6d0594d7bdc244e5000604cb replied with this 2 months (2008-10-10 00:08:10 UTC) ago, 1 hour later (#68,093):
@68,044I'm not protesting against the distribution, just that OP thinks that the ban underage porn in the USA is some new crime that came out of nowhere overnight.
I think the prosecution is ridiculous. Just that there's no reason to get mad over it, she DID fucking break the law and anyone who didn't see it coming is an idiot.
Anonymous ab0fff72ca7d80e1197974cf770ee68e replied with this 2 months (2008-10-10 00:18:05 UTC) ago, 10 minutes later (#68,096):
people who say 'the law is the law' are dumb asses who think the justice system is just. When will they bring in a system based on common sense rather than written law.
Anonymous fb8fb6038374b622cfbc89a12233718a replied with this 2 months (2008-10-10 19:57:12 UTC) ago, 20 hours later (#68,327):
@68,031> She's under 18, she knows she's not suppose to be sending other people naked pictures. What the fuck? Stop throwing that random fucking number around as if it's meaningful. So what if she's "under 18",
why the fuck can't she do what she fucking wants to with her own body? Why shouldn't she be able to send people pictures because of her
age??? FOR FUCK'S SAKE YOU BRAINWASHED FUCKING MORON, ANSWER ME THIS: WHO HAS SHE HURT? WHO WOULD SHE HAVE HURT IT SHE'D WAITED UNTIL SHE WAS 17 AND 364 DAYS THAT SHE WOULDN'T HURT 1 DAY LATER? WHO HAS SHE HURT BY DOING THIS THAT SHE WOULDNT HAVE HURT HAD SHE DONE IT IN A FOREIGN COUNTRY? AND ABOVE ALL, WHO IN THEIR RIGHT FUCKING MIND EVEN DREAMS OF CHARGING SOMEONE FOR A CRIME AGAINST THEMSELVES? SO IF A BLACK GUY REFERS TO HIMSELF AS "NIGGER", HE SHOULD BE CHARGED WITH RACIAL HATRED?I'm telling you all: if I ever find myself in a position with absolutely nothing to lose (and God knows we might all one of these days with the way things are going at the moment), I'm going to hunt down and murder as many of the prosecutors responsible for pressing these sorts of charges against kids and the judges who convict these kids of them. Not a joke. I already have a few names, and no doubt that list will grow. I won't get away with it, that I know, but I'll keep doing it until I go down. I'd rather be shot than die begging on the streets or rotting away in prison….and Christ, at least I'll die knowing I've done something for the world.
Oh, and just try to traceback this connection…
> I'm not protesting against the distribution, just that OP thinks that the ban underage porn in the USA is some new crime that came out of nowhere overnight.> I think the prosecution is ridiculous. Just that there's no reason to get mad over it, she DID fucking break the law and anyone who didn't see it coming is an idiot.People know that
CHILD porn is illegal, which they think of as little kids being exploited by old men. Nobody in their right mind would ever imagine that it applies to a case like this.
Anonymous 968dbe9a3cb66c0b3fcc435da55843a7 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-11 01:36:59 UTC) ago, 6 hours later (#68,414):
@68,327When an adult finds the CP and masturbates to it, fantasies develop. Then the adult finds younger and younger prey, until his hand doesn't supress him, and inevitable rape and other crimes occur.
She's delivering the spread of unlawful thoughts, etc etc etc. The fact anyone found out proves she was a dumbass.
Anonymous 82f7861efe849e010531d451c6e75fb0 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-11 17:49:56 UTC) ago, 16 hours later (#68,575):
@68,414Thoughts are not unlawful. And secondly, why are they therefore prosecuting people her age for possessing them? Surely there's no harm in someone having fantiasies about people the same age as them?
Furthermore, what makes it likely for and adult attracted to a 15 year old to start becoming attracted to prepubescents, but not one attracted to a 16 or 18 year old? Isn't it more likely that someone would be viewing CP because they have fantasies about children rather than the other way around? This is akin to blaming the victim for getting raped.
I'm sorry, but you're wrong.
@68,327I wouldn't advocate murder either, sorry.
Anonymous fb6e3d53c58b6e956c80f4ac5c1729ac replied with this 2 months (2008-10-12 06:20:35 UTC) ago, 13 hours later (#68,832):
That's so creepy you posted this because I live in the county next to it.
Anonymous bf981b245c9890355a893e2504dbf313 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-14 10:54:31 UTC) ago, 2 days later (#69,752):
@68,414> She's delivering the spread of unlawful thoughts, etc etc etc. The fact anyone found out proves she was a dumbass.Holy crap the thought police! welcome to Orwell's 1984, your thoughts are the property of the government.
And also, i think this is a rediculous thing to prosecute. 15 yr ols girls are raging with hormones that WANT to make the girl 'be sexy' and do sexual things It is normal, human and shouldnt be punished as illegal.
I hate the way the 'developed world' is turning into a police state, and I hope I expire before I see humanty repressed into a subserviant mass which solely does the bidding of its leaders for fear of reprisal, be it physical, mental or some other form of punishment.
Anonymous cf43afbe43c77baed08cbc3a4a35dacd replied with this 2 months (2008-10-14 16:41:17 UTC) ago, 6 hours later (#69,927):
Did I read that right? They are going to prosecute guys who RECEIVED the photos? WTF. I get a photo text and then BAM partyvan?
Anonymous 8b94b9112b91826961ecc5bb1e882347 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-15 17:25:29 UTC) ago, 1 day later (#70,455):
Anonymous 988c9e11189a093631f428ff273d7d62 replied with this 2 months (2008-10-16 00:30:11 UTC) ago, 7 hours later (#70,590):
@68,414So this happens every time, does it?
Inevitable, huh?
So if I start watching porn featuring 18 year old actresses and 40 year old actors, I'll eventually start looking for porn of 15 year old actresses and 40 year old actors right? And this leads to 12-year-old porn, right? And this will put me in a downward spiral that will end with me raping toddlers, right?
Right.
© AnonTalk.com 2008