Topic: I can't wait for Japan to make fully functional Gynoids.
Anonymous A started this topic 9 months (2009-07-03 05:36:?? UTC) ago (#28,801):
Real women will be obsolete.
Internal advertisement: This could have been your text ad, or a 468x60 px graphical banner. Why isn't it?
Anonymous B joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 06:17:?? UTC) ago, 42 minutes later (#172,150):
…Wait, did I miss something? They will be obsolete?
Anonymous C joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 06:46:?? UTC) ago, 29 minutes later, 1 hour past creation (#172,163):
Nah, no way. Nothing beats the love of a good woman :) Especially mine ;)
Anonymous D joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 08:03:?? UTC) ago, 1 hour later, 2 hours past creation (#172,222):
And nothing loves like the beat of a real woman, either.
Anonymous E joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 10:55:?? UTC) ago, 3 hours later, 5 hours past creation (#172,303):
Oh, we'll just clone ourselves then?
Anonymous F joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 19:47:?? UTC) ago, 9 hours later, 14 hours past creation (#172,474):
I have a sneaking suspicion that OP is a virgin.
Anonymous G joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 19:56:?? UTC) ago, 8 minutes later, 14 hours past creation (#172,482):
@previousHaha! I was thinking the same thing but couldn't find the right words for it.
Anonymous H joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 21:32:?? UTC) ago, 2 hours later, 16 hours past creation (#172,507):
We'll need 3 things: Fully functional Gynoids, fully developed cloning technology, and fully functional artificial uteri. Then we're set!
B'bye, bitches!
Anonymous H double-posted this 9 months (2009-07-03 21:35:?? UTC) ago, 3 minutes later, 16 hours past creation (#172,511):
@172,474If you can't see the wisdom of having women coming with an off-switch, then I suspect that you haven't been in relationship. Well, either that, or you've found that if you just hit hard enough, she'll turn off anyway…
Anonymous I joined in and replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 22:16:?? UTC) ago, 41 minutes later, 17 hours past creation (#172,530):
Abolishing women would be stupid. They are fun.
Anonymous F replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 22:18:?? UTC) ago, 2 minutes later, 17 hours past creation (#172,531):
@172,511Get real. No matter what you think, a gynoid will not compare to a real woman. And maybe you don't, but one day I would like to have kids and start a family. You couldn't do that with an android. Also, I don't have a lot of principals, but I would NEVER hit a woman, or a child. Don't fucking pretend that you know me well enough to assume otherwise.
Anonymous H replied with this 9 months (2009-07-03 22:35:?? UTC) ago, 17 minutes later, 17 hours past creation (#172,541):
@previous> Get real. No matter what you think, a gynoid will not compare to a real woman. And maybe you don't, but one day I would like to have kids and start a family. You couldn't do that with an android. Also, I don't have a lot of principals, but I would NEVER hit a woman, or a child. Don't fucking pretend that you know me well enough to assume otherwise.I didn't assume that you've hit a woman, I merely supplied it as an alternate theory to you never having been in a relationship.
With gynoids, you're the one making assumptions. Materials science, artificial humanoid motion, and artificial intelligence are all making great strides. Some years from now, they may very well come together to make the perfect Gynoid.
I also think having children is a good idea, which is why I wrote this:
@172,507> We'll need 3 things: Fully functional Gynoids, fully developed cloning technology, and fully functional artificial uteri. Then we're set!See? I fully admit that we must at the very least have a fully functional prototype of an artificial uterus, before we can send the women packing. We'll also need a spacecraft capable of landing them on Venus, where they unrealistically claim to be from.
You see? I take this very seriously, and consider all the angles! Anything to get that off-switch, I say.
Anonymous I replied with this 9 months (2009-07-04 15:23:?? UTC) ago, 17 hours later, 1 day past creation (#172,983):
@172,531> I would NEVER hit a womanYou're a sexist.
Anonymous J joined in and replied with this 8 months (2009-07-10 04:41:?? UTC) ago, 6 days later, 7 days past creation (#177,499):
@previousOnly if he WOULD hit a man.
© AnonTalk.com 2008–2010