AnonTalk BBS — Discuss anything anonymously without registration.
Anonymous 47ae211000a6a8.34833955 started this discussion 2 months (2008-05-20 19:08:38 UTC) ago:
What's the purpose of being in love with somebody and all that instead of simply wanting to fuck the other person like an animal to create more babies?
Anonymous 48332ad357cea8.77792656 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 19:50:02 UTC) ago, 41 minutes later (#18,670):
Falling in love makes the male more likely to stay and provide for the female and the eventual children, and so makes more sense on an evolutionary scale - children being provided for by two parents used to be more likely to survive than one with only a mother.
Anonymous 47ae211000a6a8.34833955 (OP) replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 19:53:12 UTC) ago, 3 minutes later (#18,671):
@18,670Makes sense, I guess…
Anonymous 48080fc87b4729.40126190 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 19:55:07 UTC) ago, 2 minutes later (#18,672):
Love evolved because our offspring are not able to care for themselves on their own — and our females are not able to care for themselves and their offspring alone. Another animal in the same predicament is the common sewer rat. Interestingly, they too experience the feelings of love.
Ask me anything about rats, I've been breeding them and using them for laboratory research since 1987.
Anonymous 48080fc87b4729.40126190 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 19:57:46 UTC) ago, 3 minutes later (#18,675):
@18,672preemptive clarification, I said sewer rat as everyone knows what that is, and rattus norvegicus would have only been confusing.
Anonymous 4831dc54210f02.57744433 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 20:00:35 UTC) ago, 3 minutes later (#18,677):
well if you fall in love, get married and your wife happens to be some kind of sex crazed hoty than niiiiiiiiiiice
Anonymous 482d9fd2611873.67109638 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 21:14:04 UTC) ago, 1 hour later (#18,723):
Much better question- why are we sentient, that makes no evolutionary sense…. unless I'm wrong…. I'd love to hear some opinions!
Anonymous 48080fc87b4729.40126190 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 21:20:19 UTC) ago, 6 minutes later (#18,726):
@18,723> Much better question- why are we sentient, that makes no evolutionary sense…. unless I'm wrong…. I'd love to hear some opinions!Niggers (non-sentient apes) in Africa are lion food. Whites in Africa (armed with high powered rifles) are not. Darwins law = survival of the fittest. Whites and Asians are the most fit to survive.
Whites are sentient because we evolved in the North, on glaciers — a stressful life that selected only the most intelligent, clever and inventive to survive — and over thousands of years, we are the result.
Anonymous 482d9fd2611873.67109638 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-20 21:25:54 UTC) ago, 6 minutes later (#18,731):
@18,726Surely, if this was true then Back people would have evolved to not be lion food? Or does evolution only apply to those that you feel it makes sense for? If natural selection coupled with random variation can create consciousness, surely it can create a black man that can avoid and even beat a lion?
Anonymous 48080fc87b4729.40126190 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-21 05:19:27 UTC) ago, 8 hours later (#18,812):
@18,731> Surely, if this was true then Back people would have evolved to not be lion food?They have — Niggers hold all the records in every running event worldwide. The first 15 to finish at the Boston Marathon last year were all Negroes from Africa.
> Or does evolution only apply to those that you feel it makes sense for?No, you were right, it applies to every lifeform, only your attempt to discredit accidentally backfired.
> If natural selection coupled with random variation can create consciousness, surely it can create a black man that can avoid and even beat a lion?Or run fast enough to avoid being eaten — which is what nature has selected for in them.
Anonymous 4820ca773721a7.55280946 replied with this 2 months (2008-05-21 14:01:31 UTC) ago, 9 hours later (#18,859):
Because we're not 'just' animals; ie mammals with smarts.
Anonymous 48080fc87b4729.40126190 replied with this 1 month (2008-05-22 16:07:46 UTC) ago, 1 day later (#19,108):
@18,859> Because we're not 'just' animals; ie mammals with smarts.But we
are animals nonetheless. We are apes, even White people are apes. ☺
Anonymous 4837127376eb91.03785318 replied with this 1 month (2008-05-23 20:25:11 UTC) ago, 1 day later (#19,429):
Guys who do this are known as "players" and women who do this are known as "hos"
© AnonTalk.com 2008