AnonTalk BBS — Discuss anything anonymously without registration.

Topic: Does pedophilia have "a number"?

Anonymous 880d8f57a317a6867e5ed3214544122a started this discussion 5 months (2008-06-29 15:33:19 UTC) ago:

"420"/"4:20"/"4/20" apparently discretely refers to "cannabis culture". Is there anything similar for pedos to use? And is there a list of these (assuming there are many different ones)?

Anonymous fe20f6d7f84f192250eb179e9289cf29 replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 15:36:39 UTC) ago, 3 minutes later (#29,472):

Well shit.

How many Pedo's joined anontalk? Jesus christ man.

Every other post is "Loli touching me" or "I'm an old pedo boo-hoo"

Wow. you guys seriously need to quit fucking children.

Anonymous 82a5a347fc255d2db2b83e34872ad0ec replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 17:51:56 UTC) ago, 2 hours later (#29,499):

No. Despite the public and cultural "outrage" against pedophilia; the government, law enforcement agencies and religions all indulge in it and approve. They only lock normal citizens up because they do not like competition.
All you need to do is STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM MY DAUGHTER, YOU FUCKERS. There is a reason I carry a concealed luger.

Anonymous 29b536572c141a41f5036f5f9386577c replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 18:41:26 UTC) ago, 50 minutes later (#29,515):

r@ygold

Anonymous 625ed60b17cb88e81825bbdb0a4452db replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 21:28:04 UTC) ago, 3 hours later (#29,543):

@29,472

Don't like the site? LEAVE. There's literally millions of other places for you to go.

I'll spell it out for you and any other meddling dumbasses:

~~~Websites are like TV channels. If you don't like what's on, add it to your block list and 'change the channel'. Don't stick around and bitch that this site is awful, you people are so-and-so, blah fucking blah. All that does is identify you as a pesky little troll that we would celebrate your untimely demise should karma come back to bite you in the ass.~~~

On Topic:

I haven't heard of any such numbers. Keep my eyes peeled for any.

Anonymous 55ad6b965253df648e318f47dc0003fc replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 23:38:58 UTC) ago, 2 hours later (#29,570):

Dunno about pedos. Aside from some 15-year-old boy, who has never seen the horror in it, I doubt it is a "cool subculture" nobody wants to be a part of.

Hackers, and ehem… script kiddies especially, like the number 3600, which comes from the silver tone, 3600Hz. There is also 7, which - if memory serves - was a device introduced in the so named 3600-magazine in the late 1980s. Ironically hacking predates the internet.

I however like the number -1. It is number posix-c-functions return to mark an error has occured. It is also a common cause of an integer overflow vulnerability. I like that it is current, negative and looking at it as the secound opcode of cmp-instruction makes me feel strangely more secure - as though it would make the code any more stable…

Anonymous 880d8f57a317a6867e5ed3214544122a (OP) replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 23:42:36 UTC) ago, 4 minutes later (#29,572):

@29,570

> 3600

What the hell are you talking about? It's 2600!

Anonymous 55ad6b965253df648e318f47dc0003fc replied with this 5 months (2008-06-29 23:51:52 UTC) ago, 9 minutes later (#29,576):

@29,572
You're rite, I'm tired and dazed.

Anonymous e600a4aa429bfa5a6823b446b2db8a74 replied with this 5 months (2008-06-30 00:44:08 UTC) ago, 52 minutes later (#29,598):

@29,570

It's not binary?

Anonymous 55ad6b965253df648e318f47dc0003fc replied with this 5 months (2008-06-30 12:05:50 UTC) ago, 11 hours later (#29,670):

@29,598
any piece of memory or disk data can be represented as binary code. The -1 return code is a signed integer representation of the binary 1000000 00000000 00000000 00000000(on machines with 32-bit processors) pushed onto the programs stack. Context as in neurocognitive science, is also everything in computing. Thankfully the programming language intrepreter and assembler does most of this kind of work for the programmer nowadays.

Anonymous 5ac5c1393f2cbf731a976794c515982f replied with this 5 months (2008-07-01 00:27:06 UTC) ago, 12 hours later (#29,784):

The number is 4-12

Anonymous 880d8f57a317a6867e5ed3214544122a (OP) replied with this 5 months (2008-07-01 00:32:29 UTC) ago, 5 minutes later (#29,785):

@29,784

Source?

Anonymous ce5f6127a5bb73b93843dd33bfc67123 replied with this 5 months (2008-07-01 02:15:56 UTC) ago, 2 hours later (#29,806):

Twelve. As in, 12chan.

Anonymous 76782db488d6ced8e422d58780fbd65f replied with this 5 months (2008-07-01 16:02:01 UTC) ago, 14 hours later (#29,880):

PTHC

Anonymous 880d8f57a317a6867e5ed3214544122a (OP) replied with this 5 months (2008-07-01 16:09:50 UTC) ago, 8 minutes later (#29,883):

@29,806

No.

@29,880

What?

Anonymous 76782db488d6ced8e422d58780fbd65f replied with this 5 months (2008-07-02 03:09:57 UTC) ago, 11 hours later (#30,044):

@29,883

PRETEEN HARD CORE

PTHC

Anonymous 416049c6dab8479b953779f4eac684c6 replied with this 5 months (2008-07-02 06:50:04 UTC) ago, 4 hours later (#30,071):

kingpass is a torrent code for teenpr0ns, i know this by accident. i swear.

Anonymous f0d6e3a909c671b6c73d5025564870fe replied with this 5 months (2008-07-02 15:10:46 UTC) ago, 8 hours later (#30,106):

Gaming has 1337 as unofficial number. Hacking has 2600 and regular porn has 69. I don't think making a pedo number is a good idea because once the thought police gets that into their head they will start attacking everything with that number instead of just you guys. And i don't like being flattened by a moral steamroller headed for somebody else.

© AnonTalk.com 2008